AFC vs. NFC:  The Gap Widens
Previous Columns
by Bill Chuang, Head Columnist, 7/16/07


We all have moments of sports glory in our lives.  I remember once in fourth grade gym class, we were playing dodge ball.  After a few of my teammates had been knocked out, it was me against about 4 guys on the other team.  I caught one of the balls whipped at me (whipped is a relative term considering it was thrown by a 10 year old), and brought in one of my teammates.  After I caught another one, I remember my gym teacher at the time saying “the worm has turned”.   Sadly, this is the extent of my sports glory, so now I compensate by criticizing NFL players.  For some reason, this popped into my head when I was thinking about the current AFC dominance over the NFC.  During the late 80’s and 90’s, the NFC dominated the AFC winning 13 consecutive Super Bowls before Denver finally broke that streak in 1998.  Before that, the AFC dominated by winning 8 of the 10 championships during the 70’s.  Since the Broncos won in 1998, the AFC has won 8 of 10 losing only to St. Louis and Tampa Bay.  The worm has truly turned.


The difference between now and the other periods of dominance is that the NFC does not have a team that can carry the jockstraps of any of the elite AFC teams.  This was not true during the period of NFC dominance.  Even when Dallas, San Francisco, Washington, and NY Giants were dominating, the AFC put forth strong competition.  Buffalo will go down in history as probably the best team never to have won a championship.  Pittsburgh, with the early days of Cowher Power and Blitzburgh with Greg Lloyd, Kevin Greene, and Rod Woodson; Kansas City with Derrick Thomas and Neil Smith as well as aging Joe Montana and Marcus Allen; the Dan Marino led Dolphins; and the Elway led Broncos were all worthy opponents.  In the 70’s, the Cowboys and the Vikings were perennial powers who could challenge the Steelers and Raiders.

Today, are there any team in the NFC that could truly match up with any of the top 5 and maybe even top 10 AFC teams?  The Bears might boast about their defense, but they were 3-5 against the AFC the past 2 seasons.   The Saints, probably the most complete team in the NFC, were 1-3 against the AFC last season.  The Eagles were also 1-3 against the AFC last year.  The Seahawks put up a bit of a fight going 2-2 against the AFC last year.   The Cowboys were able to beat the Colts and go 3-1 vs. the AFC.  The Giants and Falcons went 1-3 and 2-2 respectively.

By contrast, the Colts (3-1), Patriots (4-0), Chargers (4-0), Ravens (3-1), Bengals (3-1), Steelers (3-1), Jets (3-1),  and Chiefs (4-0) feasted on the NFC last season.  The only thing that keeps most NFC teams out of the football cellar is the fact that they get to play 12 games against each other every year.

Unfortunately for the Super Bowl advertisers, this power gap should only grow wider this year.  New England has loaded up.  San Diego, even with all their coaching changes, is still the most complete team in the NFL.  Baltimore will have a ferocious defense even without Adalius Thomas.  Ben Roethlisberger will play like he has something to prove in Pittsburgh.  Indianapolis and Cincinnati will continue to outscore its opponents.  Meanwhile Philadelphia lost its best player last year in Jeff Garcia.  The Bears still have Rex Grossman.  The Giants are auditioning for their next head coach.  Seattle’s defense is still downy soft.  Dallas is putting all of its marbles into its butterfinger quarterback who started hot, but faded down the stretch last year.  The only NFC teams that got much better this off season are San Francisco, Arizona, and Detroit, but they are far from competing with the AFC’s elite.   The Saints are the only team that might compete, but they do not have the imposing defense to go along with that formidable offense. 

Once again, and for the foreseeable future, the AFC championship should be the real Super Bowl.   At least the real Super Bowl has those commercials.